Is it, will it, has it ever been relevant?
My (educated) guess is: yes, print will endure. But how?
To back up a little, I think it's important to recognize that print media is intricately connected to literacy; and most of can probably agree that literacy is important to the welfare of individuals for empowerment and essential to society (a democracy at least) for equality.
I don't want to entertain the dystopic fantasy of a culture whose literacy extends only to the level of "functional" and is dominated by the recognition of images -
McLuhan described such a thing as a return to a tribal society, which was dominated by myth, homogeneity, and collectivism. Interestingly enough, the "Tribe" is being reclaimed as a social structure which empowers and privileges small-to-medium sized rhizomatic groups affiliated by shared interests rather than geography or heritage/ethnicity. Which is amazing, and laden with possibility and potential for social enterprise and innovation.
Donna Haraway predicted such structures (after McLuhan, of course) in her
Cyborg Manifesto to be an empowerment of the miscellaneous and part of the social landscape after the proliferation of new media. Which it is.
There are many proponents of new media and possibilities it presents for societies to reorganize themselves along egalitarian lines; however, I have to ask what are we losing?
Democracy was supposed to be enhanced by the broadcast medium.
Glenn Gould was a champion of broadcasting and recording as a democratic medium (think of Andy Warhol's assertion that the great thing about
Coca-Cola was that the President could not get a better coke than the bum on the street). Gould, it's rumoured, would even play his live performances with timing and dissonance that privileged the folks deep in the cheap seats.
So, I guess there's a tension between blanket democracy and tribal democracy in which individualism and empowerment are the gambits. Back to literacy: it's important for too many reasons to get into here (maybe you can tell how I feel about literacy by the text-heavy blog posts to which I'm predisposed), but I will say that without it our sense of individuality and interiority (the basis for things like courtesy, compassion, and empathy) will undergo some drastic changes. How we read (and, equally, what we read) has, as many neuroscientists and psychologists
will tell you, affects how our brains form thought and perceive people and the world in which we live.
And instead of just griping about the waning of literary fluency (which, culturally speaking, is only about 200 years old) into functional reading skills, here's something for us all to do: read.
Go pick up a magazine, like one of these: